Back to openDemocracy Email us Powered by TypePad  
political magazine Help bring democracy to the US
political magazine The New oD Today
political magazine China's modernisation and its discontents
political magazine openDemocracy widget
political magazine Goodbye Habeas Corpus
political magazine Dance the guns to silence?
political magazine Don't be a lawyer in China
political magazine Have we hit the ground yet?
political magazine The strange ways of Falungong
political magazine 2000 dead
political magazine April 2006
political magazine December 2005
political magazine November 2005
political magazine October 2005
political magazine September 2005
political magazine August 2005
political magazine July 2005
political magazine June 2005
political magazine May 2005
political magazine April 2005
My Photo oD Today
A weblog from the editors, staff and friends of openDemocracy.net

« Watching Iran from afar | Main | What brain drain? »

Historic day - ouch!

Today is a turning point in European history and I find myself in disagreement with Neal Ascherson AND Will Hutton AND Timothy Garton Ash AND Danny Cohn-Bendit! The first two signed the Chris Bobinsk letter he wanted the English to post to the people of France - an idea he wrote about rufully in openDemocracy. Now his letter has been published on the oD site and also in the Financial Times. Tim Garton Ash went to France to report and meditate upon the campaign and wrote a strong piece in the Guardian calling for a French Yes. But none were as eloquent or forceful as Danny Cohn-Bendit, whom I have followed more or less since 1968, writing in the International Herald Tribune.

"I am a realist who believes in social justice, human rights, environmental protection and a strong Europe that can deal withthe challenges of globaliation and project its power peacefully." Well said!

But does it follow that if the French vote 'no' Danny as warns, this will all be at risk and, "the French will lose the things they really want: real European solidarity, a true European democracy; in short, the creation of a European Republic"?

European democracy will not follow from the constitutional treaty. On the contrary, a 'yes' will convince the Brussels Eurocrats that if they scare the children they can always get their way. I am against a British 'no' if the French and the Dutch vote 'yes'. That debate is for another time - perhaps. But a French 'no' will be good for Europe and especially for the prospects of European democracy. It will be an honest rejection of a dishonest political elite.

May 29, 2005 in Blair's Bust - UK election | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454872c69e200d83459c42b69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Historic day - ouch!:

» Non, je ne regrette nien from perfect.co.uk
So France has said a resounding ‘non’ to the EU Constitution, and the Dutch are set to do the same tomorrow. This merits more analysis and comment than I have time to give, but there is one thing I would... [Read More]

Tracked on 1 Jun 2005 00:39:21

» Non, je ne regrette nien from perfect.co.uk
So France has said a resounding ‘non’ to the EU Constitution, and the Dutch are set to do the same tomorrow. This merits more analysis and comment than I have time to give, but there is one thing I would... [Read More]

Tracked on 1 Jun 2005 00:47:05



Comments

Not necessarily!

It's arrogant to assume that the currents of history will eddy in our direction.

This shock - predicted by some of us for years - may be a condition of possibility for a revival of democracy in Europe.

But the conditions of probability suggest a different outcome. It's just as possible that we retreat from continental debate.

Who'll lead, and in which direction?

Posted by: Paul Hilder | 30 May 2005 13:43:29

The comments to this entry are closed.

Back to openDemocracy Email us Powered by TypePad