Back to openDemocracy Email us Powered by TypePad  
political magazine Help bring democracy to the US
political magazine The New oD Today
political magazine China's modernisation and its discontents
political magazine openDemocracy widget
political magazine Goodbye Habeas Corpus
political magazine Dance the guns to silence?
political magazine Don't be a lawyer in China
political magazine Have we hit the ground yet?
political magazine The strange ways of Falungong
political magazine 2000 dead
political magazine April 2006
political magazine December 2005
political magazine November 2005
political magazine October 2005
political magazine September 2005
political magazine August 2005
political magazine July 2005
political magazine June 2005
political magazine May 2005
political magazine April 2005
My Photo oD Today
A weblog from the editors, staff and friends of openDemocracy.net

« What to do with your unwanted vote | Main | Campaign for European Freedom of Information Act »

The manifestos - Find the missing word

What word is missing from all the party political manifestos? What all-shaping, decisive political word, cannot be found in them at all?

No one in the openDemocracy office could guess, not even David Hayes.

It’s the gorilla in the nursery, the elephant in the living room.

It isn’t ‘globalisation’, which the Labour Manifesto mentions – the Tory Manifesto one only manages the more feeble ‘global’ a couple of times. It isn’t the ‘constitution’, which Labour claims to have reshaped.

It isn’t Europe. Alan Cowell of the New York Times launched his intelligent election coverage with a fascinating article on how Europe was a key issue at the last election but has simply been bled out of political debate in today’s Britain - even though it is arguably the most important question facing the United Kingdom.

But while not an ‘issue’ in contention, at least all the party manifestos take a stand on Europe and the EU in suitably pious ways.

No, the word all parties fear is: AMERICA

Our new found land and oldest ally has yet to be discovered so far as the current election campaign is concerned.

All three have international sections on Britain’s role in world affairs. In them Labour’s manifesto twice mentions that “we have worked with the US” (without the ‘A’). This is hardly generous. The Tory document makes no mention of the global leviathan at all. Nor does the Liberal Democrat Manifesto.

But the whole of Blair’s approach to world affairs is built on his belief that Britain has to be as close as possible to the United States of America. It is his foreign policy.

No party dares to be seen as anti-American. All fear the call from the US Embassy that would follow. Nor, now, this is a great change, dare they be seen as pro-American, for British voters do not wish to see their national leaders on their knees before Washington, the only posture that seems acceptable to George Bush. So shifty avoidance and silence follows.

It all adds to the smell of discomfort, shame and humiliation of these election days.

All real name comments welcome, please send them to anthonysblog@opendemocracy.net

April 14, 2005 in Blair's Bust - UK election | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454872c69e200d8350fd1dc53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The manifestos - Find the missing word:



Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.

Back to openDemocracy Email us Powered by TypePad