Back to openDemocracy Email us Powered by TypePad  
political magazine Help bring democracy to the US
political magazine The New oD Today
political magazine China's modernisation and its discontents
political magazine openDemocracy widget
political magazine Goodbye Habeas Corpus
political magazine Dance the guns to silence?
political magazine Don't be a lawyer in China
political magazine Have we hit the ground yet?
political magazine The strange ways of Falungong
political magazine 2000 dead
political magazine April 2006
political magazine December 2005
political magazine November 2005
political magazine October 2005
political magazine September 2005
political magazine August 2005
political magazine July 2005
political magazine June 2005
political magazine May 2005
political magazine April 2005
My Photo oD Today
A weblog from the editors, staff and friends of openDemocracy.net

« Hot Politics | Main | Chinese blogs on anti-Japan protests »

7 great issues

“Interesting, but not satisfying, I want to know your view”. This was Solana Larsen on my blog before last. Quite right: blogs are about attitude not just reporting. But to answer her I need to spell out what matters.

tom

I wrote about VoteOK and Vote4Peace trying to make an issue out of the election. Why?

The election feels like a charade. It is not that all politicians are liars or mainly lie. This is a cheap untruth. It is not that there is no difference between the parties. The point is that a general election is a rare, four-yearly moment when people can exercise power. We are sold elections as a moment when our views count. But the issues which really count about the directions we should or should not take are not on the table.

There are seven great issues facing Britain. One has been met by Labour – the economy. Thanks mainly to Gordon Brown and his team what was a crippled economy prone to ‘go-stop’ is growing and ensuring employment. There are plenty of remaining questions about structural inequalities, of course, whose resolution demands international action.

But what kind of country does Britain wish to be? Four more issues address this: the relationships with Europe and America, with democracy and between city and country.

The BBC's Nick Assinder says that Europe is the missing issue from this election. America is even more important (as I’ve blogged, it is the central, repressed source of shame these election days). Democracy (in the large sense of how we govern ourselves) is the most important of the great missing issues for me, but is only part of the whole. How city and countryside relate defines the character of a society as a whole.

The next great issue is global. Call it climate change (and see the new openDemocracy debate). Will the planet survive? Excuse me, could the politicians stop agreeing with each other about this and propose action?

That makes six great issues in all.

The seventh? The seventh is the charade itself, the way in which the issues that matter are not being addressed. The POWER Enquiry into the gap between people and politics is about this. It is taking unmistakable evidence that people, young and old, are intensely interested in political issues and increasing disparaging of politicians and official politics.

Talking with John Berger over tea in a sunny London street yesterday (he is here for the festival of his work) he was telling me how the vote in the forthcoming French referendum on the European constitution looks like being a ‘No’. He feels this is not about the constitution. Suddenly a chance has arisen for people to say no to the whole process they are being offered. If it is a “no”, it will be a vote against the charade.

This is where the two campaigns I started with come in.

Sorry if this blog is taking its time, like a puzzle I am trying to draw back the surface of things.

VoteOK is driven by a countryside against city protest. Vote4Peace is about not having a war-prone alliance with America. Both are also about the lack of democracy which links and galvanizes the great missing issues. Both are trying to rupture the charade that POWER is investigating.

In addition, the rapid growth of independent candidates challengingly described by Tom Burgis in openDemocracy.net shows how individuals are rolling up their sleeves to do it their way.

Perhaps all this action will be like the impact of the global warming that the politicians are ignoring. The heat and friction that is being generated may not (but it may) be felt this time. But sometime soon the great glaciers of party politics will break off and find themselves floating and melting and out at sea.

Real names comments welcome, please email anthonysblog@opendemocracy.net

April 22, 2005 in Blair's Bust - UK election | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454872c69e200d8348195cf69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 7 great issues:



Comments

Is it time to start a real democracy party?

My dream is to harness technology to have referenda on every key issue, and to make votes in these referenda count only as much as the voter understands the issue.

Say there was one vote a week, by post or online, with suitable safeguards (which should not be beyond us, even though they appear to be at the moment). The voter would complete a 10 or 20 question quiz, with multiple-choice factual answers available with ease through some research, the content of which is determined by a cross-party committee. Then his or her vote would be multiplied by the number of answers given correctly and tallied to determine the will of the people.

Ideally you would need some way to ensure no-one was feeding the person the answers, but the simple act of finding out the answers should make the vote informed - a key element to any democracy. How the individual came across those answers is not relevant, so long as they have access to them.

The logical outcome of this is that politicians become administrators, required to carry out the mandate of the people on every issue. Who we elect to represent us becomes less important, as they are limited in how they can deviate from the public will.

Posted by: Simon Oliver | 23 Apr 2005 16:50:43

The comments to this entry are closed.

Back to openDemocracy Email us Powered by TypePad