Back to openDemocracy Email us Powered by TypePad  
political magazine Help bring democracy to the US
political magazine The New oD Today
political magazine China's modernisation and its discontents
political magazine openDemocracy widget
political magazine Goodbye Habeas Corpus
political magazine Dance the guns to silence?
political magazine Don't be a lawyer in China
political magazine Have we hit the ground yet?
political magazine The strange ways of Falungong
political magazine 2000 dead
political magazine April 2006
political magazine December 2005
political magazine November 2005
political magazine October 2005
political magazine September 2005
political magazine August 2005
political magazine July 2005
political magazine June 2005
political magazine May 2005
political magazine April 2005
My Photo oD Today
A weblog from the editors, staff and friends of openDemocracy.net

« The Madrid Summit - Creative debates | Main | 11 March meeting: a London debate »

Madrid recommendations: internet and democracy

Just in: participants in the Madrid Conference on Terrorism, Democracy and Security have drawn up recommendations about the role of the internet in democracy, which you can read here.

The document, The Infrastructure of Democracy, states: "truth emerges best in open conversation among people with divergent views".

"Terrorism is everyone's issue. The internet connects everyone. A connected citizenry is the best defense against terrorist propaganda."

Consider yourself a connected citizen? This is about the part you play.

March 10, 2005 in Democracy & Terrorism | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454872c69e200d8347d156569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Madrid recommendations: internet and democracy:



Comments

Yes and Know.
If democracy is about an informed electorate voting thoughtfully on major issues via their elected representative, no.Seemingly most of the electorate does not use the internet in this way expecting the sound bites of their representative to suffice for information.

Yes in that by expending a lot of time, less as one learns which writers do so factrually and truthfully with a minimum of spin, one can be informed, even ahead of decisions.
Two items detract from this being useful or effective. The first is democracy itself, the majority rules. This majority increasingly or always places entertaiment above obligation. Secondly a minority may obtain a hearing it is limited and occasional.
Today the Spin, avidly followed by much of the media, mostly by omission swamps, deliberateley?, rational thought which needs not only facts but time.
The Western nations are very good at this a reflection of the wealth, that is so many competing 'entertainements', deliberate control by the leaders, and a consenting press which sees profit, short term and they don't suffer much in the long term, as their role.

Posted by: douglas jones | 11 Mar 2005 04:32:10

The comments to this entry are closed.

Back to openDemocracy Email us Powered by TypePad